Stephane,
LOL I have done much work and analysis over Motors, ESC, and Prop combinations for the ASW 20 to include offset. I have nearly come to the conclusion that Eflight and Hanger 9 engineers really know what they are doing. The eclac software has been priceless to test bench (software) 100's of combinations. The results of which can be narrowed down to a few simple conclusions. 1. Nothing is free. 2. There is a cost financial and engineering for performance. What Hanger 9 has done with the standard set up appear to me to be a combination of performance, price, and solid configuration. HAVING SAID ALL THAT, I think there is a justifiable case for upgrading the prop to a 17x10 which produces .94 to 1 thrust to weight ratio when the proposed 16x10 produces .85 1 thrust to weight ratio. Perhaps not a big deal but a cheap hop up with no other degradation that I can see. I think it best to harden ESC however to 120A.
The work continues......
​Bob
LOL I have done much work and analysis over Motors, ESC, and Prop combinations for the ASW 20 to include offset. I have nearly come to the conclusion that Eflight and Hanger 9 engineers really know what they are doing. The eclac software has been priceless to test bench (software) 100's of combinations. The results of which can be narrowed down to a few simple conclusions. 1. Nothing is free. 2. There is a cost financial and engineering for performance. What Hanger 9 has done with the standard set up appear to me to be a combination of performance, price, and solid configuration. HAVING SAID ALL THAT, I think there is a justifiable case for upgrading the prop to a 17x10 which produces .94 to 1 thrust to weight ratio when the proposed 16x10 produces .85 1 thrust to weight ratio. Perhaps not a big deal but a cheap hop up with no other degradation that I can see. I think it best to harden ESC however to 120A.
The work continues......
​Bob
Comment